Enforcement orders issued to remedy significant risks posed by unlawful carport and photovoltaic solar panels structures
Gold Coast City Council v Bush & Anor – What’s the case about? The Planning and Environment Court delivered a decision in the case of Gold Coast City Council v Bush & anor [2017] QPEC 29 which involved an application made by Gold Coast City Council to the Court seeking an enforcement order under section 604 […]
ReadmoreApproval of an extension request for multiple unit residential development – consistent with current planning scheme and sufficient community awareness
Lake Maroona Pty Ltd v Gladstone Regional Council – What’s the case about? The Planning and Environment Court of Queensland delivered a decision in the case of Lake Maroona Pty Ltd v Gladstone Regional Council [2017] QPEC 25 which involved an appeal by Lake Maroona against the Gladstone Regional Council’s refusal of a request for […]
ReadmoreLand use code can still be incorporated to rating category description even though it is not approved by resolution
Ugarin Pty Ltd v Lockyer Valley Regional Council – What’s the case about? The Supreme Court of Queensland delivered a decision in the case of Ugarin Pty Ltd v Lockyer Valley Regional Council [2017] QSC 122 which involved a judicial review challenge by Ugarin Pty Ltd against the Lockyer Valley Regional Council’s decision relating to differential […]
Readmore3 residential towers approved on former ABC site despite significant conflicts with planning scheme
The Planning and Environment Court delivered a decision in the case of Bell v Brisbane City Council & Ors [2017] QPEC 26 which involved an appeal commenced by a submitter Kate Bell against the Council’s decision to approve, subject to conditions, a development application made by Sunland Developments No. 8 Pty Ltd. The development application […]
ReadmoreObjection to an expansion of issues in dispute results in an adverse costs order
The Planning and Environment Court in LMRM Pty Ltd v BrisbanCity Council [2017] QPEC 7 made an order that LMRM Pty Ltd pay the Brisbane City Council’s costs of and incidental to its application to expand the issues in dispute in the appeal, on a standard basis. The appeal related to the Council’s decision to refuse […]
ReadmoreNo ability to regularise an unlawful industrial use in Rocklea
The Planning and Environment Court in Delta Contractors (Aust) Pty Ltd v Brisbane City Council [2017] QPEC 13 dismissed an appeal by Delta Contractors (Aust) Pty Ltd against the Brisbane City Council’s refusal of its development application for a development permit for a material change of use for a warehouse with an ancillary office and […]
ReadmoreA change to a proposed service station, carwash facility and drive through restaurant was declared to be a minor change
The Planning and Environment Court in King of Gifts (Qld) Pty Ltd & Anor v Redland City Council & Anor [2017] QPEC 15 declared that a change to a proposed service station, carwash facility and drive through restaurant was a minor change. The changes to the proposed development comprised the following: refining the onsite sewerage […]
ReadmoreApproval of multiple-dwellings development – all depends on the adequacy of the proposed drainage system
The Planning and Environment Court delivered a decision in the case of Spry v Brisbane City Council & Anor [2017] QPEC 16 which involved a submitter appeal against the decision of the Brisbane City Council to approve a development application for a development permit for 3 multiple-dwellings. The issues in dispute in the appeal concerned […]
ReadmoreHigh-rise units (not PPR) rating category was the correct category
Marchesi v Noosa Council – What’s the case about? The Land Court delivered a decision in the case of Marchesi v Noosa Council [2017] QLC 19 which involved an owner’s appeal against a decision of the chief executive officer of Noosa Council on the owner’s objection to the rating category for several parcels of land. The […]
ReadmoreIs your planning scheme robust enough under the new planning framework?
It is less than 2 months before the commencement of the new planning framework in Queensland under the Planning Act 2016. Assessable development Under the new planning framework, there are 2 categories of assessment for assessable development, namely code and impact assessment. Code and impact assessment The Planning Act requires the following: Code […]
ReadmoreDevelopment Assessment Rules
In anticipation of the commencement of the Planning Act 2016 on 3 July 2017, the Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning has released the Development Assessment Rules. The Development Assessment Rules is a statutory instrument made by the Minister under the Planning Act. It is one of the key instruments under the new planning framework […]
ReadmoreRequest to change a development approval up in flames
The Planning and Environment Court delivered a decision in the case of Lipoma Pty Ltd v Minister for State Development & Ipswich City Council [2017] QPEC 6 which involved the Ipswich City Council making an application to the Court seeking declarations that: the Minister was not the correct responsible entity pursuant to section 369 of […]
Readmore
