This edition of the Gadens Regulatory Recap highlights recent developments from ASIC, APRA, ATO, ACCC, Treasury and the RBA, including various enforcement actions taken by the regulators.
Consumers fall victim to these types of scams as the warning signs are not obvious. Unlike “too good to be true” scams, the investment returns being advertised will usually appear reasonable. Scammers are also careful not to rush decisions and will often present as knowledgeable. Detecting these scams is further hampered by the fact that there is little information online to compare against the scammer’s ‘fake’ website or emails.
ASIC’s advice is that to protect consumers, companies should advise against acting on suspicious social media posts and encourage independent verification. Consumers should also be urged not to transfer funds into a bank account unless it is in the name of the relevant financial services business. If scammed, consumers should cease contact, report it to authorities, and warn others. The key message from ASIC is that vigilance and verification are essential to safeguard against these types of scams.
The key takeaway from Mr Longo’s speech is that the regulator is committed to pursuing legal action and making use of all available regulatory tools at its disposal to ensure consumer protection.
Mr Longo discussed the evolution of greenwashing, noting that it is not a new concept but rather a recent manifestation of misleading or deceptive conduct. He outlined the common types of greenwashing conduct and emphasised the need for responsible entities to ensure they make accurate and substantiated sustainability claims to ensure informed decision-making by investors.
ASIC supports the introduction of internationally aligned mandatory climate-related financial disclosure requirements in Australia to improve transparency and combat greenwashing. Other initiatives like the development of a sustainable finance taxonomy and labelling system for investment products were also endorsed.
The speech reiterated the importance of accuracy and transparency in sustainable finance and affirmed ASIC’s commitment to combatting greenwashing to maintain market integrity and investor trust.
ASIC and the Markets Disciplinary Panel has issued a fine of $775,000 to JP Morgan Securities Australia Limited for permitting suspicious client orders to be placed on the futures market, ASX 24. ASIC’s investigation found that, between 11 January and 3 March 2022, a client placed 36 orders that JP Morgan should have suspected were submitted with the intention of creating a false or misleading appearance relating to the market for the Eastern Australia Wheat futures January 2023 (WMF3) contracts. The Market Disciplinary Panel found that the orders exhibited characteristics of being placed to manipulate the market, and that JP Morgan’s failure to identify the trades as suspicious was “careless”. JP Morgan has complied with the infringement notice and made payment of the fine.
The founder of Eneco Refresh, Mr Henry Heng, was sentenced to a recognisance release order on providing a security of $10,000 for a good behaviour period of 12 months. Mr Heng pled guilty and was convicted of nine counts of breaching section 205G(10) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Corporations Act) for failing as a director to notify the market operator of a change in his interests. These charges follow Mr Heng’s sentencing of 18 months imprisonment for market manipulation and false or misleading appearance of active trading on 19 April 2024.
On 7 May 2024, the director of Metal Alpha Pty Ltd, Mr Brett Trevillian, pleaded guilty to two offences of making a false document with the intention of obtaining a financial advantage, and two offences in respect to reports related to two of the offered products. Gadens previously covered Mr Trevillian’s charges in the 8 August 2023 edition of the Regulatory Recap.
ASIC has commenced proceedings in the Federal Court against an individual and his related companies, Principal Financial Services Pty Ltd, Sc, Provest Enterprises Pty Ltd, and Superfunds Australia Pty Ltd ITF Principal Superannuation Fund. ASIC is undertaking an investigation into the operations of the companies in relation to financial advice and client trading activity from January 2016 onwards. The Federal Court has made orders to preserve the assets of the company and Mr Prakash, as well as to prevent him from leaving Australia. The matter is listed for a case management hearing on 16 May 2024.
Two company directors based in Western Australia have been convicted and fined $5,000 each for failing to comply with section 1272C(2) of the Corporations Act after failing to have director identification numbers. Magistrate Crawford SM stated, in making the sentences, that efforts had been made by government agencies to ensure directors were aware of their obligations to obtain director identification numbers.
On 3 May 2024, the Federal Court found that BPS Financial Pty Ltd (BPS) engaged in unlicensed conduct in offering the “Qoin Wallet”, which was a non-cash payment facility using a crypto-asset token “Qoin”. Justice Downes found that BPS contravened the Corporations Act from January 2020 as it did not hold an Australian Financial Services Licence, and was not otherwise authorised to issue or provide financial advice. It was also held that BPS engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct and made misleading or false representations about the Qoin Wallet. This matter is the first court outcome obtained by ASIC relating to a non-cash payment facility involving crypto assets. Penalties are yet to be determined by the Court.
Discussions were focused on ensuring member services are delivered efficiently, honestly and fairly. The CEOs acknowledged that trustees face a number of challenges in responding to the revised regulations. However, they recognised the importance of the new regulatory requirements in promoting industry accountability, identifying process risks and the impact their respective controls and mitigation actions can have on the member experience as a whole.
Overall, ASIC and APRA emphasised the importance for the industry to foster a strong culture of transparency, accountability and consistency.
Member Smith emphasised APRA’s support for insurers to address these challenges, including by creating innovative products that are adapted to today’s demographics and risk profiles, and increasing transparency around risk assessment, product design and pricing processes to rebuild consumer trust.
APRA recognises that collaboration is key, emphasising that building a thriving industry requires a united effort from all stakeholders, including insurers, industry bodies, government, financial advisors, and consumer groups.
The Report also detailed various successful activities used by government, law enforcement, and industry to disrupt scams, including data sharing of scam phone numbers and bank account details, use of intelligence to enhance detection of scams, the take down of over 3,500 investment scam websites, diverting scam victims to IDCARe and other assistance, and the stopping of scam payment transactions.
Focused on security and fraud prevention, the ATO has implemented stronger controls for myGovID users, prioritising the safety of taxpayers’ information and Australia’s revenue protection. Taxpayers are urged to play a significant role in protecting their personal information online, as Personally Identifiable Information exposure increases the risk of data theft and subsequent fraudulent activities. Vigilance in information sharing and system security is emphasised. In cases of compromised taxpayer identities, the ATO activates stringent security measures and collaborates with affected individuals to remedy the situation.
Continued collaboration with regulators, banks, law enforcement partnerships and taxpayers is emphasised to enhance fraud prevention efforts, with the IGTO’s recommendations aligning with ongoing initiatives to fortify defence mechanisms.
Taxpayers are encouraged to promptly report suspicions of stolen TFN’s or illegal use of tax-related information to the dedicated ATO hotline on 1800 467 033.
Feedback from the current and proposed new reporting entities on the reforms closes at 5:00pm AEST Thursday 13 June 2024.
‘Privacy by design’ is a process for embedding good privacy practices into the design specifications of technologies, business practices and physical infrastructures. The OAIC explains that this means building privacy into the design specifications and architecture of new systems and processes.
Ms Kind’s address highlighted the significance of Privacy Awareness Week, with an emphasis on the theme of power in privacy, particularly in empowering individuals through strengthened privacy practices. Key issues discussed in the speech include:
In conclusion, Kind expressed optimism around upcoming privacy reforms, highlighting their potential to strengthen regulatory oversight, empower individuals, and foster innovation in a trusted data environment. The Commissioner urges collective action to “power up privacy” in preparation for the evolving data age and a new era of privacy reform.
BNPL providers are currently generally exempt from credit reporting provisions of s6 of the Privacy Act. The OAIC is broadly supportive of the proposed changes in the Draft National Consumer Credit Protection Amendment (Low Cost Credit) Regulations 2024 that will require licensees to obtain credit information from a credit reporting body as part of its suitability assessment before providing BNPL credit. OAIC agrees with Treasury that the current lack of regulation has the potential to result in poor consumer outcomes for individuals. The OAIC also expressed support for a broader review of Australia’s credit reporting framework, emphasising the need for alignment between the regulatory frameworks under the NCCPA and the Privacy Act.
Treasury has released two consultation papers and is seeking input from interested stakeholders.
The first consultation paper is concerned with the regulation of accounting, auditing and consulting firms and seeks stakeholder feedback on the adequacy of:
Submissions on the first consultation paper are open until 28 June 2024.
The second consultation paper is concerned with the tax regulator’s information gathering powers and seeks stakeholder views on:
Submissions on the second consultation paper are open until 31 May 2024
With a view to reducing the regulatory burden on interfunding activities, Treasury announced that it would exempt interfunding transactions from certain notification requirements and feeds under the Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers Act 1975 (Cth). The government has produced draft regulation to this effect and is seeking stakeholder feedback.
The consultation closes on 31 May 2024.
If you found this insight article useful and you would like to subscribe to Gadens’ updates, click here.
Authored by:
Matthew Bode, Partner
Kelly Griffiths, Partner
Michael Kenny, Partner
Sinead Lynch, Partner
Daniel Maroske, Partner
Kate Mills, Partner
Caroline Ord, Partner
Anna Fanelli, Senior Associate
Philip O’Brien, Senior Associate
Zira Norman, Senior Associate
Bronte Anderson, Associate
Tehlyn Murray, Associate
Carla Simmons, Lawyer
Declan Melia, Lawyer
Jin Lim, Lawyer
Kartia Bouras, Lawyer
Ellie Pitcher-Willmott, Paralegal