Earth to the Mothership: a reminder to liquidators bringing group unfair preference claims to follow the rules
Recently, some liquidators appear to prefer to commence unfair preference claims against multiple defendants within a single proceeding, rather than multiple separate proceedings. Proceedings commenced in this way are often referred to as ‘mothership proceedings’. The appeal of ‘mothership proceedings’ from the liquidators’ point of view is obvious. Justice Brereton in Re Bias Boating Pty Ltd[1] […]
ReadmoreGadens Connect | 2020 Edition One
Welcome to Gadens Connect – a newsletter to share insights, trends and opportunities for our clients in the financial services industry. In this edition we share some key performance insights from 2019 and provide an overview of topics including updates to our GPSR platform (automation and integration solutions), MIP sale obligations and updates to the […]
ReadmoreConsiderations for an early release of superannuation request
Quite often a lender will receive a request from their customer to support an early release of superannuation to assist with mortgage repayments and pay outstanding arrears in situations where the lender has commenced enforcement action for possession of the mortgaged property. Click here for full size image. […]
ReadmoreUpdate: Banking Code of Practice
Following recommendations made by the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services industry, ASIC has approved an updated version of the Banking Code of Practice, which will take effect from 1 March 2020. Click here to download the full article. […]
ReadmoreASIC appeals Westpac’s success in the responsible consumer lending test case
In Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Westpac Banking Corporation (Liability Trial) [2019] FCA 1244, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has brought a ‘test case’ considering alleged breaches of responsible lending obligations against Westpac Banking Corporation (Westpac). In particular, ASIC alleged Westpac breached the National Consumer Credit Protection Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act) through the use of its […]
ReadmoreLender’s minor omissions have major impact in summary judgment application
In Secure Funding v West [2017] QDC 169, the District Court of Queensland provides a helpful reminder of the importance of complying with contractual and legislative notice requirements. As this case demonstrates, it is important for lenders to be able to demonstrate service of default notices so as to avoid minor omissions which can be costly. […]
ReadmoreMarshalling – what is it and how can it help a second registered mortgagee?
Marshalling is an equitable doctrine designed to protect second registered mortgagees from not being paid because of the arbitrary or capricious realisation of a security property by a prior mortgagee. In certain circumstances, a second registered mortgagee may be able to access surplus proceeds of sale from a property which it did not hold a mortgage […]
ReadmoreEconomic duress – what it is, and what it is not
Customers in disputes with their lender often raise economic duress in circumstances where a lender attempts to take enforcement action. The potential ramifications are significant because a successful claim of economic duress can render the relevant agreement voidable. However economic duress is not simply the application of economic pressure applied by one contracting party over […]
ReadmoreBorrowers punished for behaving unconscionably in taking advantage of a lender’s mistake
The New South Wales Supreme Court decision of Citigroup v Wernhard [2019] NSWSC 132 considers whether certain conduct by the borrowers was unconscionable (as against a lender). Borrowers sold one of three properties that was held as security for loans to them, but the lender mistakenly released mortgages over all three. The borrowers noticed the mistake, subsequently sold […]
ReadmoreJoint and several liability: effect of compromising the debt against one debtor
If a lender agrees to compromise its debt with one debtor who is jointly and severally liable for the debt with another debtor, does this compromise the whole debt? Not if the compromise is appropriately documented. What is joint and several liability? Joint and several liability is where each debtor to a common debt […]
Readmore
